Report Says Offshore Wind Will Boost UK GDP By 0.6% by 2030
Offshore wind will more than pay for itself in future
A CEBR report commissioned by Mainstream Renewable Power, a multinational comnpany with an office in Glasgow, reveals that Offshore Wind will more than pay for itself in future and reap rich rewards in terms of jobs and UK GDP. The report is entitled The macroeconomic benefits of investment in offshore wind
The Cebr report finds:
- Offshore wind sector to boost UK GDP by 0.2% by 2015 and by 0.4% by 2020.
- Potential for UK Offshore wind sector to create 45,000 jobs by 2015, over 97,000 jobs by 2020 and 173,000 jobs by 2030.
- By 2030 with a £18.8 billion boost in net exports offshore wind could plug 75% of the UK’s current balance of trade deficit”.
(Dublin 12 June 2012) – Mainstream Renewable Power, the global renewable energy company, today announces the publication by London’s Centre for Economics and Business Research (Cebr) of a major new report into the economic impact of the UK’s offshore wind sector out to 2030.[1] The Report has been published to coincide with the first ever Global Offshore Wind conference being held in London.
Two years ago, the Offshore Valuation Group measured the value of the UK’s offshore renewable energy resource[2] and concluded that, by 2050 – by harnessing less than a third of that resource – the UK could generate the electricity equivalent of 1bn barrels of oil a year, reduce its CO2 emissions by 1bn tonnes and create over 145,000 new jobs.
This new June 2012 Cebr/MRP report builds on that work by exploring the impact of planned investment in offshore wind electricity generating capacity in the UK. It concludes that that investment can be expected:
- By 2015 to increase UK GDP by 0.2%, and create over 45,000 full time jobs, delivering employment and economic growth at a time of economic fragility.
- By 2020, to double that GDP contribution to 0.4%, and the number of people employed to over 97,000.
- By 2030 to triple that GDP contribution to 0.6%, and sustain 173,000 jobs. These benefits will accrue from pursuing current build out rates of offshore wind. A more aggressive, but achievable, approach could see an annual 1% uplift to GDP, and the creation of up to 215,000 jobs, and in addition, the sector could deliver an increase in net exports of £22.5bn, sufficient to almost entirely plug the UK’s current balance of trade deficit.
Furthermore, a foreign trade multiplier (FTM) analysis of the impact of increasing levels of offshore wind investments and exports leads Cebr to contend that significant multiplier impacts can be expected to derive from investment in offshore wind.
For instance, while Cebr predicts that by 2020, under its Accelerated Growth scenario, investment in offshore wind will generate £8.4 billion of Gross Value Add (GVA) to the UK economy, the application of their FTM model suggests that this contribution could rise to £10.5 billion.
These differences are even more marked by 2030, when the estimated difference in impact – between that suggested by the domestic and FTM multipliers – is (for employment) three times the difference estimated for 2020.
Commenting, Eddie O’Connor, CEO of Mainstream Renewable Power said “The “Value of Offshore Wind” to the UK is truly significant. Cebr shows that the net economic benefit to UK plc from investment in offshore wind is considerable. The foreign trade multiplier effect is of particular interest to a sector which has the potential to supply a global market. By helping the UK reduce fossil fuel imports, and by creating a new industry, offshore wind will create jobs, assist in balancing the trade deficit and boost GDP at a time of economic uncertainty.
“Later this year we will publish a companion paper which will show that offshore wind is a very attractive investment to include in a diversified, low carbon generation resource portfolio. Including a substantial amount of offshore wind will help in the achievement of the government’s long-term goals to decarbonise the UK’s electricity sector by lowering risk and cost to UK consumers.
“We have embarked on a once off transition to a sustainable economy. All forms of renewable energy, from solar energy to tidal energy, will contribute to delivering this transition in the UK. But offshore wind provides this country with a clear global comparative advantage, particularly when the UK government and industry will this week publish their strategy to reduce the cost of offshore wind to £100/MWh by 2020. Cebr’s findings underline the importance of that strategy, and the very significant potential economic benefit that this sector will deliver to the UK.”
Oliver Hogan, Head of Microeconomics at Cebr and principal author of the report said: “The current economic circumstances and the competitive challenges facing the UK highlight the importance of taking actions to improve the country’s trade balance. Such actions, by acting directly on the factor that is constraining growth, can be expected to have particularly important foreign trade multiplier impacts.
“It is Cebr’s contention that, given the positive impacts on the UK’s balance of trade outlined in our report, these significant multiplier impacts can be expected to derive from investment in offshore wind.”
Links
New Statesman article (summary)

A very upbeat report as one would expect from a financially interested Multinational Renewables Company.
However despite the billions invested in Wind Power tonight, with a power demand of 28.37GW (UK National Grid Status), our wind industry is producing a piddling 0.169GW or just 0.6% of demand with Nuclear/fossil making up the rest.
This doesn’t seem to me to be a very smart investment if we have got to maintain a parallel Nuclear/fossile reserve for occassions of low wind the likes of which have been with us over the last few months.
I can’t see the Scottish Government’s target of 100% renewable being technically feasible even if FM Salmond believes so.
Pressure is very slack over the UK landmass at the moment, and yes, wind isn’t making much of a contribution. However, if you look at current windspeeds down the East coast a short distance offshore (where much of the planned offshore wind capacity is going to be installed) you will see that they are significantly higher. (Use XC Weather or similar).
The report was commissioned by a multinational renewables company, but it was produced by the Centre for Economics and Business Research, an organisation which has no renewables axe to grind as far as I know.
Out of 15 accredited and generating offshore farms in 2011/12, 6 farms using Siemens 3.6MW turbines have had their bearings corrode. Gunfleet I & II and Burbo A produced virtually nothing this year and of the other 3, Rhyl, Lynn & Inner Dowsing only Lynn produced more than the previous year.
If this is the reality for the low power turbines, I would not have much confidence in the CEBR report’s prediction for the future when 6MW turbines and larger are in operation. Attractive investment? Pulling 200 turbines to bits at sea isn’t cheap. Fortunately, Siemens have a reputation to preserve and money. Thanet array (Vestas) efficiency is below 30% in its second year of operation which is far too low so something is awry there.
This problem comes alongside the grouting problems.
As you know, I’m not keen on these things at all but the waste of effort and engineering errors is egregious. The fact that it’s German engineering … German engineering is useless unless the input is controlled; eg an extruder would only work efficiently if the pellet size is an exact 2mm square cube whereas a Brittish extruder would work even if you stuck a log down its throat.